Migrant crossings: No 10 policy chiefs explored using powerful sonic weapons to halt journeys across the English Channel

Currently used in the United States to disperse crowds and tested by the Greek government against migrants crossing the sea, their use is controversial. 

An example of a sonic weapon seen on a Royal Marines landing craft in 2012
Image: An example of a Long Range Acoustic Device seen on a Royal Marines landing craft in 2012
Why you can trust Sky News

No 10 policy bosses have explored the use of powerful sonic weapons to force migrants to turn around in the English Channel, amid a growing row over how to handle the situation.

The Long-Range Acoustic Devices (LRAD) are already installed on two Border Force vessels but are used to issue voice commands. They were purchased by the Ministry of Defence for use as loud-speakers during the 2012 Olympic Games in London.

However, Downing Street policy experts called for them to be used as sound cannons which emit loud, high-frequency noise powerful enough to induce vomiting.

Currently used in the United States to disperse crowds and tested by the Greek government against migrants crossing the sea, their use is controversial.

A British Border Force boat tows a dinghy used by migrants into Dover harbour, in Dover, Britain, January 14, 2022. REUTERS/Hannah McKay
Image: A British Border Force boat tows a dinghy used by migrants into Dover harbour

The request was turned down by the Home Office after senior figures suggested the plan would not work.

It comes amid a growing blame game over a failure to stop people from crossing the Channel in small boats, despite repeated policy announcements and pledges to get a grip.

The Navy is set to take central command of the issue after the Home Office won the backing of the prime minister for the plan.

More on Migrant Crossings

Home Office source says Patel had pushed for military involvement

A Home Office source said the involvement of the Navy would protect against strike action proposed by Border Force staff, angry over plans to turn back small boats in the Channel.

The French government has said such a plan would be illegal and it would not accept migrants being returned to its water in this way.

Sky News has been told that the prime minister vented his frustration at Home Secretary Priti Patel in a meeting at the end of last year after nearly 30 people died in one crossing in late November.

A senior Home Office source said Ms Patel had been pushing for military involvement for some time and had been repeatedly blocked despite crossings increasing.

Priti Patel update on  China spies
Image: Home Secretary Priti Patel

They added: "Everyone is frustrated with the situation but the only person coming up with workable ideas is Priti. Nobody else has come up with anything useful and if other departments had pulled their weight earlier we wouldn't be in this situation now."

Answering an urgent question in the Commons on the matter on Tuesday, Defence minister James Heappey told MPs deploying Britain's armed forces to "ensure that our borders are robust" is "indeed a perfectly appropriate use of them".

Defence minister: Government 'exploring every avenue' to prevent crossings

He continued: "The government has been exploring every avenue to prevent further crossings and has now appointed defence to take operational primacy for cross-Channel counter-migration operations which will see a much larger and more visible role for the Royal Navy with regards to operational planning, asset co-ordination and operational delivery."

Mr Heappey added: ""Detail of how defence will deliver and maintain primacy of cross-Channel counter migration operations going forward is currently being worked through.

"The government's objective is that nobody should arrive illegally in the UK on their own terms, thus all vessels transporting illegal migrants across the Channel must be intercepted before or as they land."

Asked by Conservative MP and former army officer Bob Stewart if he believes the use of the Navy will reduce the number of crossings, Mr Heappey replied: "I believe it could."

Conservative MP James Heappey speaks to the media outside the Houses of Parliament in Westminster  - 12-Dec-2018
Image: Defence minister James Heappey said the government's objective is that nobody should arrive illegally in the UK on their own terms

Currently 'no plans' to use devices

A spokesperson for the department said there are currently "no plans" to use the sonic devices to deter migrants, but added: "As part of our ongoing operational response and to prevent further loss of life at sea, we continue to test a range of safe and legal options to stop small boats making this dangerous and unnecessary journey."

A Ministry of Defence source said research had been conducted jointly with the Home Office into use of LRAD's in the Channel but the plan had been rejected as it would not work.

LRAD devices are in use by the Ministry of Defence Police Marine Unit on the Clyde.

A Ministry of Defence spokesperson added: "Unacceptable numbers of people continue to make the dangerous Channel crossings and last November's tragic deaths serve as the strongest reminder of the need to stop them.

"The government is exploring every avenue to prevent further crossings and details of how that can be achieved will be made known in due course."

Read more from Sky News:
Man trying to cross Channel dies in sub-zero conditions
2021 marks record year with more than 28,300 people entering UK via English Channel

Other ideas to prevent crossings have previously been suggested and then later scrapped, including the use of nets - which was proposed by a Home Office official in October 2020.

Number 10 has been approached for comment.

Labour's shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said "Number 10 seems to have lost any sense of respect or humanity if they can stoop this low for the sake of headlines.

Targeting sonic weapons at people in small boats will not stop criminal gangs from profiting, it will just put more lives at risk. The Home Office is right to reject it.

"Time and again we get unworkable and dangerous policies briefed for the sake of headlines instead of serious hard work to tackle the problems."